Cameras


I’ve been using SLRs since I was in high school.  Below is a list the cameras that I’ve used, past and present.

Nikon D750 (March 2016 – Present)

m_d750Specs

  • Sensor: 24.3 Megapixel CMOS
  • Camera Type: Full Frame (no crop)
  • Image Processor: Expeed 4
  • Dust Reduction: Yes
  • Autofocus: 51 Point User Selectable with 3D subject tracking
  • Metering: 91K pixel RGB
  • Viewfinder: 100% View Pentaprism
  • Display: 3.2″ 1229K Pixel
  • Drive: 6.5 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1080P (60 fps), 720P (60 fps)
  • WIFI: Yes
  • Tilting LCD: Yes
The D750 is my first full frame camera. I considered upgrading to another Canon, but there wasn’t a model on the market at the time that could match what Nikon offered. I decided to buy into the new system and I’m really pleased with it. Nikons have more buttons but they allow me to change more settings without taking my eye away from the camera. The menus are more complicated and the ergonomics are not quite as smooth as Canon, but overall I love my Nikon. It has incredible dynamic range, extremely accurate autofocus, amazing 3D subject tracking, a reasonable burst rate, and great low light performance. And its packed into a body that weighs less than my 7D.

Lenses

  • AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR – great range, very sharp, vibration reduction
  • AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/4G ED VR – amazingly sharp, vibration reduction
  • AF-S NIKKOR 85mm f/1.8G – fast, beautiful bokeh, slowish focus, tricky aperture if you don’t pay attention
  • AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.8G – fast, nice bokeh

Canon EOS 7D (May 2010 – Present)

Specs

  • Sensor: 18 Megapixel CMOS
  • Camera Type: APS-C (1.6x crop)
  • Image Processor: Dual DIGIC IV
  • Dust Reduction: 3 Way
  • Autofocus: 19 Point User Selectable
  • Metering: 63 Zone TTL
  • Viewfinder: 100% View Pentaprism
  • Display: 3.0″ 920K Pixel
  • Drive: 8 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1080P (30 fps), 720P (60 fps), 640 x 480 (60 fps)
I kept my 7D even after buying into the Nikon system for several reasons. First, it’s still a good camera with great ergonomics and a high burst rate. Second, it is a crop camera, making the 1.6x magnification factor very useful for wildlife photos. Third, the body had depreciated in value so much over its life that it was better to keep it as a backup body instead. It is the successor to the EOS 50D and is my second Canon camera. It looks very similar to the 50D, but includes advanced features that were taken from the top of the line models at the time. The biggest advantage over the 50D is video. This was my first SLR with video. It can shoot full HD (1080 and 720P) as well as VGA.

In addition to video, the 7D has a more advanced autofocus system with 19 focus points (versus 9), a brand new metering system, a 100% view in the viewfinder (which is very rare in SLRs), dual image processors, and very fast continuous shooting.

Lenses

  • EF 70-200mm f/4L – This  is an amazing beautiful lens. It was the first professional fixed aperture zoom I purchased and it set the standard in sharpness and contrast for all of my future lenses. It isn’t stabilized, but it focuses quickly, and has great contrast and color. Many of my best photos were taken with this lens.
  • EF-S 17-55mm f/2,8 – This is not one of Canon’s L lenses in name but acts like it in quality. This lens is sharp and provides a 27-88mm equivalent focal length on my crop camera. Since it is a crop-only lens, its lighter than most of my other lenses. It’s a great lens.
  • EF-S 60mm Macro f/2.8 – My first macro and all I can say is “wow”! This is a crop-only lens and provides a 96mm equivalent focal length. It’s great for macro but also portraits as well. Like many macros it is extremely sharp even wide open. Another great, light lens.
  • EF 24-105mm f/4L – The 24-105mm is Canon’s standard issue kit lens for its full frame cameras. I purchased this one refurbished expecting it to provide the same quality as my 70-200mm zoom. Based on its reviews it should have, but mine has a major focusing issue that prevents it from being as sharp as it should be. After my 90 day warranty expired I noticed that it wasn’t giving me the quality I expected. I did some research and found out that this lens is notorious for manufacturing variations and it is very common to get one that isn’t sharp. The only way to fix it is to send it in and pay for an adjustment.
  • EF 50mm f/1.8 II – I owned Canon’s “nifty fifty” a few years ago but eventually sold it because I wasn’t using it. I used it to take many great photos of the boys during their first couple of years but eventually stopped using it after purchasing my 17-55mm and 60mm macro. It’s also the cheapest lens I had for my Canon, both in price and materials – it had a plastic lens mount, a virtually non-existent focus ring, and a loud AF motor.The glass was good but the rest of the materials were cheap. It has since been replaced with a more substantial model with a metal lens mount, sturdier construction, and faster and quieter motor.

Canon EOS 50D (June 2009 – May 2010)

Specs

  • Sensor: 15.1 Megapixel CMOS
  • Camera Type: APS-C (1.6x crop)
  • Image Processor: Single DIGIC IV
  • Dust Reduction: Yes
  • Autofocus: 9 Point User Selectable
  • Metering: 35 Zone TTL
  • Viewfinder: 95% View Pentaprism
  • Display: 3.0″ 920K Pixel
  • Drive: 6.3 fps Continuous Shooting (unlimited frames)
  • Video: No :(
I bought my EOS 50D in late 2009. It was a big step for me. I had been using a Pentax for four years. I was fed up with the slow focusing, the poor low light performance, and the terrible continuous shooting speed (useless for any type of fast motion). The Pentax was my first digital camera. I had already made an investment in lenses and a flash and was considering upgrading to the current model in the prosumer slot.

After reading reviews, I realized that the current Pentax wasn’t going to do it for me. Nikon had just released the D90, which was one of the first digital SLRs with video. It came with a great kit lens. I tried it out at Best Buy and was saving up the money to buy it. I had my mind made up but decided to play with the EOS 50D just to make sure… and I fell in love. The 50D didn’t have video, but it had so much more.

It was sturdy, felt great in my hand, and had an awesome continuous burst rate, which were more important to me than video. I didn’t have any lenses for it, of course, so I had to make a big investment in equipment. I also bought something that I’d always wanted: a battery grip. What a great buy! The 50D would have given me several years of great service, but I sold it to my friend, which enabled me to upgrade to its bigger brother, the 7D.

I started out shooting JPEG with this camera and eventually discovered the huge advantages of RAW. The files were bigger but they were far more malleable out of the camera.

Lenses

  • Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM – I bought this to replace my 18-55mm and 55-250mm Canon lenses in hopes that a single lens with a wide zoom range would allow me to capture better photos. I bought it right before a trip to Texas in 2010 and used it for a couple of years. I took many, many photos with this lens due to its versatility. Many of the photos from the boys’ first year were taken with this lens. Unfortunately it suffered from severe softness around 200mm, mediocre contrast, and significant chromatic aberration. I sold it after I bought my 70-200mm.
  • EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS – This was the short end of your typical two-part kit lens. Inexpensive with a variable aperture and micro-motor autofocus. Image stabilization was a bonus. Overall the lens was fine but not great.
  • EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS –  This was the long end of your typical two-part kit lens. Inexpensive with a variable aperture and micro-motor autofocus. Image stabilization was a bonus. Overall the lens was fine but not great.

Pentax *ist DL (May 2005 – June 2009)

Specs

  • Sensor: 6.1 Megapixel CCD Sensor
  • Camera Type: APS-C (1.5x crop)
  • Image Processor: Pentax
  • Dust Reduction: Mmmmmm… no
  • Autofocus: 3 Point
  • Metering: 16 Zone TTL
  • Viewfinder: 96% View Pentamirror
  • Display: 2.5″ 210K Pixel
  • Drive: 2.8 fps Continuous Shooting (5 frames)
  • Video: Not so much…
The *ist DL was my first DSLR.  I didn’t have any interest in DSLRs for a long time.  They were expensive and the image quality just didn’t seem to match that of film.  The *istDL was one of the first digital SLRs to drop into my price range.  I had been thinking about getting into the digital world for a while and the *ist DL allowed me to do that.  I only had to purchase the body; I could use the lenses from my film camera (with a bit of a zoom, but it wasn’t too bad).  As much as I told myself that I would still shoot film, I rarely touched my film camera after I got the *ist DL.  It was just so much easier to take pictures, see what they were going to look like, and then dump them onto my computer.  They were easy to edit and easier to print than film.

The camera itself was very light weight and fit well in my hand.  It had the same basic layout as my film camera (it came from the same series), so it was very easy to get used to. It was considered a consumer SLR and was less advanced in some areasthan than the film-based *ist that I was upgrading from.  The autofocus system only had 3 points versus 11 on the *ist and they weren’t selectable which added a bit more work to focusing. There was also no illumination for the LCD screen on top of the camera.  It did have a bigger viewfinder and faster continuous shooting, so that made up for it a bit.

I never used it to shoot RAW, which is a bummer. I have some good photos from it but they are all JPEGs and were sharpened to death by the camera. They looked good at the time :)

It served me well for the four years that I used it.  I even bought digital-specific lenses for it about six months before I upgraded to my 50D.  I keep it as a history piece. The quality of its images are laughable compared to what is available today.

Pentax *ist (July 2003 – May 2005)

Specs

  • Sensor: A Piece of Film
  • Camera Type: Film (No Crop)
  • Image Processor: Nah
  • Dust Reduction: No, no
  • Autofocus: 11 Point User Selectable
  • Metering: 16 Zone TTL
  • Viewfinder: 90% View Pentamirror
  • Display: Analog LCD
  • Drive: 2.5 fps Continuous Shooting (until roll is empty)
  • Video: Not so much…
  • Other: Auto film advance, auto rewind, auto load
When I graduated high school I had to give up the venerable K1000 that I’d been using for so many years.  It belonged to the school and I couldn’t keep it.  This gave me the opportunity to save up my money and purchase a more advanced camera – one with things like autofocus, auto metering, semi-automatic modes, continuous shooting, and LCD display, auto film advance, and of course, auto film rewind.

I bought a Pentax because it was the only camera that I had ever used.  The *ist was released as a high end consumer model alongside their first digital SLR, the *ist D.  It not only had autofocus, but it had 11 points of autofocus.  I could even select which focus point I wanted it to use!  I liked the silver color of the body and lenses as well as the large informational LCD on the back.  This is one of the few cameras to have two LCDs and the only film camera I know of that had a large LCD on the back.  People often thought it was digital due to the screen.

As is the case with all of my photography, I never took enough photos with it, but it worked well when I did.  I took some of my best film photos with this camera including the lily at UNH and my friend Matt’s senior pictures. I still have it and I tell myself that I’m going to load it with black and white film and take some photos so I have something to develop in my darkroom.  That’s what I tell myself.

Pentax K1000 (January 2001 – July 2003)

Specs

  • Sensor: A Piece of Film
  • Camera Type: Film (No Crop)
  • Image Processor: Nah
  • Dust Reduction: No, no
  • Autofocus: Not Invented Yet
  • Metering: Center Weighted TTL
  • Viewfinder: 91% View Pentaprism
  • Display: No
  • Drive: As fast as you can click the shutter and advance the film
  • Video: I don’t even think camcorders were invented yet
The Pentax K-1000 was my first SLR camera.  It wasn’t even mine, actually.  It was the camera that I used in the High School News and Photo class that introduced me to photography.  The K-1000 is all manual – focus, exposure, film advance, rewind, film load, and shutter. The only thing that was battery operated was the exposure meter (you still had to dial in the settings though).  It was a heavy son of a beast, made mostly out of metal.  I have fond memories of my K-1000 and the various lenses that I used with it before I knew the true meaning of aperture, shutter speed, and focal length.  Oh those innocent times!

As I said, the K-1000 that I used in High School belonged to the school, but I also acquired one of my own, which is currently sitting in my darkroom. They certainly don’t make cameras like they used to!

© Copyright Relatively Ambitious - Theme by Pexeto